Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A glance at parents' attitudes toward their children's education brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether today parents are more involved in their children's education compared to the past. Although some sociology scientists state that the simple training system in the past allowed parents to assist students in doing their assignments, I, as a graduate business student and a mother of two kids, believe that the new education system forces all parents to be involved in students' learning process.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that new technology provides people a lot of extraordinary opportunities to supervise their kids. For example, I can check my son's score easily via the Internet without visiting his school and write my feedback about his progress and improvement. On the other hand, I can observe my son's behavior in the classroom through the installed camera in the class, and critic the instructor's teaching style, if I think it is not effective. Therefore, it is easier for parents to understand their children's abilities and skills.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that today we respect the knowledge more, and we consider it a valuable and precious capital, conversely, in the past, people learned specialty by experience rather than academic information. Since parents did not take education seriously as a means of mastery, they preferred not to be engaged in the learning process. Thus, it is conclusive that parents have not been bothering themselves with their children's pedagogy.
Admittedly, course materials used to be easier to understand, and students must not grasp all new theories in atomic physics. Most of the parents complain about the difficulties of new concepts, which means they are not able to guide students through them. For example, students are required to take fundamentals of the economy, no matter what their majors are, while in the past, only students interested in business needed to pass this course, and most parents cannot comprehend it. Nevertheless, I still assert that parents in all generations had less information compared to their offsprings, but today people try to solve pupils' problems or hire a private tutor for them to make sure they can be successful. In fact, people care a lot about the education of the next generation and investigate the possible barriers.
Due to the aforementioned arguments explored in the previous statements, I personally presume that modern, open-minded parents are more involved in their children's pedagogy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 530, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...nts to be involved in students learning process. The foremost reason why I am supporti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
..., in the past, people learned specialty by experience rather than academic informa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, i think, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21241050119 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85586165572 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558472553699 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1173734165 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.6 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9333333333 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294849879572 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970018624196 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792975409426 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168346790484 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073216840666 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.