The passage questions the accuracy of the memoir written by Chevalier de Seingalt recounting his life and adventures and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that the memoir is pretty accurate and reliable and refutes each of the passage's reasons.
First, the passage states that Chevalier was not rich as he claims in is memoir because he had to borrow considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that Chevalier had assets which needed some time to be converted to cash, in the meantime, he borrowed money from a Swiss merchant to spend.
Second, the article claims that the memoir could not capture the conversation between Chevalier and the famous writer Voltaire accurately. But, the professor argues by saying that Chevalier, every night, wrote notes about the conversation he had with Voltaire, and while writing his memoir he regularly consulted those notes.
Third, the reading says that Chevalier escaped from prison in Venice through well-connected friend and by offring a bribe. However, the professor opposes this by saying that old government document in Venice state that after Chevalier's escape from prison, the prison had to repair the sealing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oir he regularly consulted those notes. Third, the reading says that Chevalier e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32663316583 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60351947927 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2261644924 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.5 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237503690707 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107547770429 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807948667595 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144872028608 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739802408017 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.