The article states that humpback wales migrate far distances through the aid of stars and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor avers that the idea may seems fascinating, but not enough sagacious reasons have been illustrated and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that the whales have cognitive ability to find their routes through stars. However, the professor cast doubts on this point by saying that they are not far intelligent. He explains that the idea is more considerable in animals like birds and provides an example of duck to illustrate this. Accordingly, this is an intrinsic characteristic and does not have any correlation to intelligence. Moreover, the whales use the ability in the same way as ducks.
Next, the article posits that the wales swim straightforwardly through guidance of stars. The professor contends this point by saying that they never use stars to choose direction. He asserts that the wales have magnetic ability which help them to swim directly. He thinks that magnetic forces are the only characteristics that they implement to immigrate in straight line.
Finally, The passage asserts that humpbacks whales have curious ability in which come to the surface of water for watching stars to discover direction. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point and explains that the animals like sharks look at prey to find direction. He cast doubts on the aforementioned idea and inquire about the time that stars have been disappeared in the sky. Correspondingly, speculation never comes to fruition since the whales also migrate during the day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to illustrate this. Accordingly, this is an intrinsic characteristic and does not...
^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humpbacks'' or 'humpback's'?
Suggestion: humpbacks'; humpback's
...e. Finally, The passage asserts that humpbacks whales have curious ability in which co...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, however, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33076923077 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90096902806 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6719475087 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291315591351 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914001021696 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482171670607 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167092995089 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427391747076 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.