Recently, the phenomenon of internet development and its corresponding impacts on libraries disappearance has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of conventional library is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that online source of information can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, information on the internet can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that easy accessibility as well as high-speed data finding. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that students who use online research are not required to extend their assignments deadlines. Thus, the beneficial consequences of online libraries and its accessibility apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of learning, online data and e-books might increase the consequences of less traditional libraries' usage. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of paper books related to this reality that the demerits of books pertain to the limited availability of sources. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of the libraries are correlated negatively with physical locations and limited list of the available books. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of online information as a key tool for the available source of research.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of e-books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of online data prove the significance of accessibility, but also pinpoint libraries implication
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'libraries'' or 'library's'?
Suggestion: libraries'; library's
...opment and its corresponding impacts on libraries disappearance has sparked a heated deba...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'libraries'' or 'library's'?
Suggestion: libraries'; library's
...se the consequences of less traditional libraries usage. Moreover, the fundamental aspect...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'libraries'' or 'library's'?
Suggestion: libraries'; library's
...nce of accessibility, but also pinpoint libraries implication
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64184397163 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28552749356 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7229118044 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24656113695 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833453578784 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383653704109 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134617404953 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668511051372 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.