Recently, the phenomenon of Televisions and its features are beneficial and essential part of human life and become a companion and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of its importance is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that television and its features program can create enormous entertainment & news awareness can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, Television provides a massive amount of social awareness through its content can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of increasing people knowledge, as well as share the different costumes with people which are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered television can help people to become a companion and act as a friend. Thus, beneficial ramifications of news on television apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, TV which exerts a pernicious influence on human might increase consequences of sedentary lifestyle. Moreover, fundamental aspects of decreasing social interaction would relate to this reality that demerits of being solitary pertain to watching one's time. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that downside of losing family reunion is correlated negatively with misguiding. Thus, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of adverse effect on human's life.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of Television which make one's life blissfully happy outweigh its demerits. Thus, the positive aspects of television should be considered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s of being solitary pertain to watching ones time. As a tangible example, some acade...
^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...reconceived notion of adverse effect on humans life. To conclude, while there are com...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ve that merits of Television which make ones life blissfully happy outweigh its deme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58219178082 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14652076133 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3576702672 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226115471725 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07923464909 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603588981296 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131236670529 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672708785489 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.