Recently, the phenomenon of unemployment and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that introducing rapid urbanization cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that moving to cities not the only effective way to solve this problem, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss and disagree with rapid movement to cities. At first, living in the city helps people for occupy better jobs than living in rural areas. However, there are many problems with urban living. For example, inhabiting in the city causes issues such as overpopulation, food resource problems, and crowded streets.
In addition, better job positions in companies located in large cities improve the family financial situation and well-being. However, replacing al people brings many financial problems due to lack of farming and agriculture. From a scientific research undertaken by a reputable university, a significant number of advanced countries with lower rates of rural living are faced to budget issues to import food and farming products and also solve air pollution.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of rapid urbanization far outweighed its benefits. Not only for the societies, but also for our planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of unemployment...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esource problems, and crowded streets. In addition, better job positions in com...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...products and also solve air pollution. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99868476882 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640692640693 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2350657201 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.416666667 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146899022077 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483540616473 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442554374911 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842305023479 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043965870368 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.