Recently, the phenomenon of doing the most high-level jobs by men and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that governments encouraging women on high-level jobs can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, a certain percentage of high-level jobs reserving for women can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the correlation between men and women on reserving high-level jobs in the society might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this
remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly
believe that the benefits of interaction governments with encouraging a certain percentage of women on a high-level job far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages
of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint
thorny issues’ potential implications.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70588235294 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3108082283 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1524694147 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.090909091 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.12807881773 194% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0882693584058 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337348965433 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0163266051867 0.071462118173 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0290662351996 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322508183946 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70588235294 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3108082283 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1524694147 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.090909091 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.12807881773 194% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0882693584058 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337348965433 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0163266051867 0.071462118173 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0290662351996 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322508183946 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.