Some universities deduct marks from students works if given in late what are your views and what action will you recommend to take

Essay topics:

Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?

Universities deduct marks from students' if works are given was always a controversial topic. Many people believe that institutions has to implement new methods of submitting the assignments on time instead of cutting the marks. I strongly disagree with the statement that few reminders has to be send before deducting marks. This essay would further elaborate the recommended actions that universities has to take with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.

Firstly, the assignments or task given by the faculty or college sometimes may not be understandable to the students and they will wait for other students to complete the task, copy the assignments from fellow classmates. For example, the topic provided on global warming, will not be clear to few students those who are low in their academics. This example clearly exemplifies us that deduction of marks is not the best solution and lectures has to think about low performing students.

Secondly, reducing marks creates an discrimination among students. University professors has to think new ways of submitting given assignment work on time. The best solution for this is lecturers has to sit with the students and ask them the problems or concerns that they are facing in submitting task. Universities must provide proper guidelines to such students and instill discipline and make them punctual.

To conclude, instead of reducing marks universities has to implement new ways for students who do not submit assignments on time and encourage such students with proper guidelines

Votes
Average: 5.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'classmates'.
Suggestion: classmates
...ete the task, copy the assignments from fellow classmates. For example, the topic provided on glo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ed on global warming, will not be clear to few students those who are low in their...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ts. Secondly, reducing marks creates an discrimination among students. Universi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as to, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36437246964 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97806786303 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554655870445 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5066929007 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.416666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223034821169 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879648356191 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076280905767 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141001866435 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422856983682 0.0609392437508 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.