In recent times, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the importance of separate relaxed environments for work and study on the peoples' lives across the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation.
This essay will enumerate the reasons why most of the people agree to the fact that multitasking is difficult, rather than having an opposing view.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which proponents cite the benefits of focusing on a single task at a time. One of the preponderant reasons is that not all individuals are gifted with the ability to do multiple tasks at the same time. For instance, an organization always gives an individual time away from work to learn new technologies and during this period the individual is not asked to do work. Therefore, this process
not only makes the individual learn new subjects but also gain practical knowledge.
On the contrary, there are some individuals especially few polymaths have an inborn ability to learn multiple fields at the same time going against the nature of human beings. For instance, as per a study conducted by the University of Chennai, it has been proposed that only 2% of the human being can succeed in both academics and profession at the same time. Thus it is needless to say that one should be left at his own comfort and peace in doing one specific task at a time.
To conclude, it is evident that concentration is derived when one gives utmost importance to a single
activity at a time. Hence, in my opinion, it is wise to say that individuals should learn to meditate to stay focused on their job or at their learning process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...demics and profession at the same time. Thus it is needless to say that one should b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75432525952 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70971595442 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.3301110376 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.909090909 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144210850537 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619511260484 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557936552098 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574907637781 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527273074049 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.