Recently, the phenomenon of successful companies and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of reputation is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a good selling policy would also bring a reputation for a successful organization and I am going to discuss that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, accomplished company's offers can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that reputation achievement as well as customer satisfaction. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that well-known companies emphasize on marketing strategies to achieve a sustainable popularity. Thus, the beneficial consequences of discounting and free offers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of promoting a product, a sale promotion might increase the consequences of propaganda. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of overall population related to this reality that the demerits of being popular pertain to the struggling with a competitive environment. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of reputation are correlated negatively with the number of competitors. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the reputation as a risk-taking action of organizations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of selling strategies for successful organizations such as discount far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of priceless offers prove the significance of selling policies, but also pinpoint reputation implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8381294964 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46331151946 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622302158273 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.829361035 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157421066779 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050510180949 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030784993102 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879231082936 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328388902938 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.