Nowadays, travelling has become an essential part of our education system. It can be agreed that getting the knowledge by exploring the world can make the learning experience far better, while people, on the other hand, stands a perspective that travelling has nothing to do with education and a wastage of time. This essay will further elaborate on both the sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that students can learn about distinct cultures, traditions, and values by visiting different places that can not be gained by reading books. Travel can not only provide students a realistic view of the world, but it can also help the students to acquire salient practical knowledge about various aspects. For example, by reading the books students can get information about any aspect, but they would not be able to memorise it until they are not experiencing the actual situation.
Notwithstanding, some people tend to believe that purposeful information can only be gained by reading the books. Besides, travelling is only a wastage of time and it can also distract the students from other academic subjects. As an illustration, according to the startling new research, 70 percent of students who went on tours for the study were failed in their final examination. It hardly needs mention that all these demerits have a far-reaching impact on candidate's learning.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some drawbacks, the role of tours in qualifying pupils is instrumental indeed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0977443609 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86572711226 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597744360902 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2719212353 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0660686536813 0.242375264174 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242452904715 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257210281679 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0385064784572 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264938825583 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.