One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is being Vegetarian. There is a widespread worry that this would only lead to a myriad of concerns in the society. The substantial influence of switching to become vegetarian has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on people in recent years. Intriguingly, however, some people believe that it cannot force such an approach. This essay will assertion on the positive side of the contention before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
There is a deluge of arguments in favour of turning eating preference, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that a good healthy lifestyle benefits lie eating vegetables and fruits. In this context, it is worth mentioning that meat and unhealthy junk food to have zero preference. For example, the study result published by the food department of Australia in March 2015 and April 2017 show that people who switched to being vegetarian had a very good lifestyle and had all the sources of nutritions in their body. All these benefits stand mankind in good stead when healthy life is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that the cruelty in killing those animals and the process is depressing. Besides, focusing on just the healthy lifestyle it would be unfair to if we kill animals like this. For example, the studies conducted by the department of PETA in April 2014 and June 2017 reveal that we should always consider the importance of nature and try to understand the animal made products and at the cost of loosing their lives families. Hence, it is clear why many are in favour of giving them less demand for it.
From what we have discussed above, we can conclude that impact of animal killing is only coming through high demand of consumers and should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9512987013 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6814860176 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4730837096 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0911697187559 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316055763161 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271274866783 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.051964993351 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276546463317 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.