Recently, the phenomenon of the prevalence of lazy journalism and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that lazy journalism cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that lazy journalism can be a minus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to disagree with lazy journalism. At first, a journalist can gather news and provide articles in better time and very easy. However, they might offend the copyright rules. For example, the journalisms may copy their news from their colleagues by replacing synonym words to make their own articles.
In addition, the news that gathered from the Internet and other newspaper may be true. But, this information that found from Internet can be fake and can endanger the reputation of newspapers and media. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2018 has shown that there are a significant number of fake news and event info published by a journalist that gathered from unknown resources.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on the kinds of journalism, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of lazy journalism far outweighed its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of the prevalen...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onym words to make their own articles. In addition, the news that gathered from...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that gathered from unknown resources. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33953488372 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00241835102 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613953488372 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.330313886 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.363636364 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113040784166 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441567248106 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448374121289 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741540830137 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568328973893 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.