Recently, the phenomenon of lazy journalism and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that searching news in digitalized world cannot be highly trustful, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that gathering news in digital space cannot be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss spreading news found out from digital spaces. At first, a journalist can gather news from the internet and other news channels in a short time. However, news from other sources cannot be trustful. For example, there are many aggressive web sites that publish fake news.
In addition, adding news of an event on bulletin before other journals and news web sites could enhance the level of a news channel. But, it is very important for reputed journals to broadcast actual news to attract more attendances. For instance, a recent research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2018 has shown that a significant number of news channels such as BBC and MBC NEWS prefer to send their reporters in the location of an event to gather real reports of a sports event or natural circumstances to save their reputations.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this topic, I profoundly believe that drawbacks of lazy journalism far outweighed its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of lazy journal...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sive web sites that publish fake news. In addition, adding news of an event on ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...of an event to gather real reports of a sports event or natural circumstances to save ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcumstances to save their reputations. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15611814346 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88671125833 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611814345992 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8440116543 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.090909091 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946542943948 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432658523647 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395115875999 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700665046079 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459319490029 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.