Recently, the phenomenon of deducting marks on the student’s late work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of not procrastinating works is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that deducting student's marks can be a plus, and I will discuss that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, the deduction of student's late works can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of having discipline, as well as working on-time, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that deductible marks help students being hard-working. Thus, beneficial ramifications of on schedule student's assignments and working base on discipline apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, low student's marks might increase the consequences of learning deficiencies. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the education system could relate to this reality that the demerits of course improvements pertain to lack of lesson developments. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of grade's deductions are correlated negatively with the procrastination. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of overdue works.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting mark on late works far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being on-time prove the significance of the deduction of marks, but also pinpoint the role of learning implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63571428571 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33592076449 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5532879228 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996195093158 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337921223445 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332478716439 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568043272086 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368980461635 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.