The graph compares the average number of UK officers traveling every day by three different vehicles over a period of 60 years.
There were clear that while both car and train have risen dramatically in the 60-year period, the bus has fallen gradually in the same period.
In 1970, the majority of vehicles were off cars, there were 5 million and using bus was the second choice of commuters in this year which were 4 million.. People have started to use the train each day so the average number was 2 million. From 1970 to 2030, while both car and train have begun to rise, the bus has started to fall. Traveling by car has risen about 4 million and the train has climbed approximately 2,5 millions of commuters. By contrast, the number of commuters traveling each day by bus has fallen sightly about 1 million
In 2030, the number of people using the car will highest with 9 million and the train will overtake bus to become the second choice of commuters with 4,5 million people. People will less use the train to travel in the future with 3 million users
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The graph below shows the numbers of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...muters in this year which were 4 million.. People have started to use the train ea...
^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...d the train has climbed approximately 2,5 millions of commuters. By contrast, the number of c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53125 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27303028283 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484375 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.069866325 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36087426445 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167680964407 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756231572353 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20332858858 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839925053124 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.