In many countries, a small number of people can earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In many nations, there are some people who can have a high amount of money from their salaries. Therefore, some people believe that it has a positive effect on the country, while others believe that governments should not pay high salaries. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of people who can earn extremely high salaries. First, government subsidies for career are believed to equalize working opportunities among people regardless of their family background. This financial support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority.Especially, money is really important and it helps people to pay for many things including water, electricity bills or furniture, which promotes an egalitarian society. Second, a high salary would result in a higher supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that salaries and workplace conditions of human capital are imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nation.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once the government allows extremely high salaries for some people. First, offering people high salaries would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country and the difference between poor and rich people. Generating no income from product and need to pay for necessary things, companies could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. Second, allow a high salaries would tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in working and adding a great burden for staff apply and benefits of the company and potentially wasting time that these young people could spend their time on suitable career paths. It,instead, would be a more salary viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted people and hard-working.
In conclusion, despite the long term of high salary in people’s lives, it also helps them too much for living. Meanwhile, it has more drawbacks than advantages with the government and especially with citizens. From my perspective, government should pay a suitable salary with their position and capacity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
- The bar chart give information about the rate of adults of kind of age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006 61
- The table shows the proportion of the workforce who are women and the proportion of managers who are women in five different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries more and more are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reason for this How can people can research this 73
- If people could choose between a life without work and spending most of their time working they could always choose not to work To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart show the price production in four countries from 2005 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 903, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
... their time on suitable career paths. It,instead, would be a more salary viable o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49104859335 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97191102705 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570332480818 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2224335416 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.1875 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344893613281 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116809203886 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625852152292 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213115017217 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334377163777 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.