extreme sports like skiing, rafting, diving should be banned. agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of life-threatening sports and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that facing up the challenges are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that overcome fears can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From high-risk activities standpoint, adventurous sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that trying new occasion, as well as workout, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered reaction in the body. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cure and mental problems apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of risky tasks, disturb body might increase the consequences of balance. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a chance of permanent injuries relate to this reality that the demerits of leading to accidents pertain to addiction to the sport. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of fame and money is correlated negatively with mental features. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of adrenalin.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being keen on exciting experiences far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of developing self-confidence prove the significance of universal interest, but also pinpoint making money implications

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activities'' or 'activity's'?
Suggestion: activities'; activity's
... throughout this essay. From high-risk activities standpoint, adventurous sports can prov...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59842519685 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28446518865 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688976377953 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7451584623 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0654496602517 0.242375264174 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0208683261977 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0212889594272 0.071462118173 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0358503543303 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110851291333 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.