Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education plays a very crucial role in our lives. It often determines our level of success and provides us in-depth knowledge about the particular subject. Many people think that students should take history courses no matter what their field of study is, others disagree. In my view, history knowledge is not important for students for the following reasons.
The main reason is that students will waste a lot of time studying history. In order to learn different topics of history, students will be required to focus and study hard, especially for the science major students because they always think logically. For instance, when I was in Pharmacy college, in the first year we had basic and introductory subjects like pharmacology, biostatistics, anatomy, medicinal chemistry, etc. It was quite easy. However, our university announced that we had to take one more history course in order to graduate. The course was about the local history of the town since that town was a very well-know historical place. In the beginning, it was easy, but as we approached to the core part, it was very difficult for most of the students. We had to study hard, spending many hours behind it. One time I had to spend my all week just to understand one concept which took my study time away from other subjects which affect our overall concentration. As you can see, study history is not important for students.
Another reason is that you will get history knowledge from the internet or reading books. Nowadays technology is booming and many information are available at our fingertips. You can find thousands of books at the library about the history. For example, my brother studied history, science, math, physics, etc when he was in high-school. In nursing school, he had to study in depth about human anatomy and physiology. This subject is so vast that required at least four years to finished. One time he participated in the drama which was based on the local history. He had no clue about it, so he went to libraty and brought many books. Also, he watched many youtube videos to get the general knowledge about it. He spent enough time but understood the particular part of history. On the other hand, his friend who was a history major, spend four years in college, had the same amount of knowledge as my brother did. He was surprised that my brother got so much knowledge about history beeing a science student. This experience tought me that you can learn about history any time by referring resources, not by taking a history course in college.
In conclusion, University stydents should not to take history courses. Not only do they waste their time doing so, but they also get knowledge from the internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...oks. Nowadays technology is booming and many information are available at our finger...
^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...oks. Nowadays technology is booming and many information are available at our fingertips. You ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87041036717 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60341705636 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498920086393 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4841157879 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7586206897 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9655172414 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.20689655172 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197084970267 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578288072144 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075557461241 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148895095368 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517112525741 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.