What are the advantages and disadvantages of studying the plays and theatrical arts which were written centuries ago?
All literary genres contain the very essence of their times. These art forms act like mirrors showing the true images of specific civilizations. The study of the century old dramas and plays by pupils in their student career is beneficial for understanding human development but its downsides also cannot be ignored. This essay discusses both sides in detail.
To begin with, the prime benefit of studying drama and other literary genres makes students aware of the traditions, customs, rituals, and lifestyle of people of bygone centuries. This awareness about various communities assists pupils in understanding human behaviours. For instance, famous playwright Shakespeare’s works have immortalised his time. He is not known as a dramatist of the 16th century but of every century. Besides this, young people become aware of the follies done by people of specific cultures and learn lessons to avoid those in the present era. Thus literature teaches youngsters to tread on right path and avoid wrong customs
On the flip side, studying theaters during student career is considered sheer wastage of time and energy. In the world of cut-throat competition, youngsters are required to pay attention towards modern sciences these days which eventually help them in excelling in academic and professional fields. Furthermore, the comic, tragic and romantic plays of old days distract young minds. They start taking imaginary flights on the wings of fantasy. This escapism affects their mental growth and they become skeptical in human dealings.
To conclude, it is drawn that studying literature in school and college days is beneficial for personal growth, simultaneously, the bad impact of these literary pieces cannot be ignored. A balanced pedagogical approach is needed to adopt to take the benefits of classical writings.
- Some people always follow their dreams even if the dreams are ambitious Some think people should focus on achieving realistic goals 45
- some people believe that it is good to do multiple jobs,while others believe that it is better to focus on one job?Do you agree or disagree?I 67
- Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
- environment pollution. 75
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...sons to avoid those in the present era. Thus literature teaches youngsters to tread ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...anced pedagogical approach is needed to adopt to take the benefits of classical writings...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45614035088 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86732582771 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645614035088 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.669585771 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0913583467814 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247123234154 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300244556514 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0535899086983 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026815910993 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.