Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
It is not unusual for us to see parents sending their children to school in early mornings. Nowadays, demand for fine education is well-spread globally, causing an instant need for experienced teacher. Whereas, in the past this occupation was severely despised. The sudden increasing value of teachers was unavoidable in todays’ generation.
First, with education, the ugly duckling received the chances to turn into a graceful swan. Most powerful and influential contributors for all kinds of field in the world had received certain education, and they were the most delicate art work of their teachers. Take my friends, Jane, as example, who was now the leader of our stem club in schools, was not a science girl 2 years ago. She failed on exam, ruined her term paper, until Mike Bowe Professor took over the class, who was much nicer and more professional than our previous tutor. Under careful teaching of Mike, Jane did extremely well on her science project and found the stem club. And that’s how a good teacher can change a student entirely.
Second, good teachers are still scarce at present. Those are the teacher who not only teach knowledge on the textbook but also teach them to find their own interest and distinct characteristic. News and comments about how a teacher could ruin a student life or how they “produce academic robot” were keeping taking the head line of most social media at present than in the past. Last month, a student conduced a suicide because he could not endure his teacher’s tirade against him in front of everyone, not mention the 3 months he had been compelled to finished homework until 3 o’clock in the mid-night. However, rare teacher realized or have noticed the burden had been gradually eroded the student. Therefore, a fine teacher in both academic field and characteristic shaping is highly appreciated.
Third, it is the cult of education and the pressure of competition that dragged people’s concerns and demand for the “best” teacher in the world. We hold these stereotype that only education can ensure a sustainable life in the future or providing the opportunity to enter into upper classes in this society. Therefore, teachers are required to do their best to help students to pass example, get into college, and get a job. Teachers have definitely played a key role in this society, which everyone was obliged to be taught by at least one in their childhood. However, education was not that necessary in the past. Most children have worked in a factory in our age.
In a nutshell, teachers are welcomed in all nations, because they are the guider of novice to the society. Their values are beyond teaching academic knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
- Elephant 88
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n instant need for experienced teacher. Whereas, in the past this occupation was severe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, well, whereas, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06194690265 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82285973474 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586283185841 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0372396052 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.79166666667 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201212579735 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519219591548 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421884925518 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112553026951 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328264847731 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.