Everyone needs food, in fact, to generate the energy for living and for everyday work. Being a vegetarian is a part of many cultures around the world, conspicuously in India. In recent past, many people inclined to opt to be vegetarian due to the ethical reasons. This essay will discuss, why it is ethical to eat vegetables over animal meat.
Every animal on the earth like to live longer and afraid to die soon. There is no doubt that the suffering that they feel is very real. For instance, one can clearly observe that the cows lie down in a slaughterhouse are terrified and shed tears especially when they hear the intimidating colleague's death voice. Therefore, human should avoid killing animals for the food and instead, it should be encouraged to love them.
Vegetables are rich in a complete stack of nutrients.
Naturally grown vegetables contain all type of nutrition and also it has a positive impact on the environment, which also makes it an ethical stance. A recent study shows that those who eat vegetables only live much longer and flourishing than whom eat other food. Therefore, being a vegetarian may beneficial in many ways than become carnivorous.
This essay discussed why it is important to be a complete vegetarian than having food includes flesh.
In my opinion, consume vegetables are much more ethical than eating meat and therefore, vegetarianism should always be encouraged.
- Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat. 69
- Do teachers punish students for late submission of assignments in universities? 77
- Global warming 77
- Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat 82
- Of all the Fortune 500 companies, only 4% have female CEOs. The government should change policy so that women make up an equal 50% of executive business positions. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'colleagues'.
Suggestion: colleagues
...ecially when they hear the intimidating fellow colleagues death voice. Therefore, human should av...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'colleagues'' or 'colleague's'?
Suggestion: colleagues'; colleague's
... when they hear the intimidating fellow colleagues death voice. Therefore, human should av...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...y live much longer and flourishing than who eat other food. Therefore, being a vege...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05508474576 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77447260194 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9637411703 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2142857143 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326040318172 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101428067962 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129708352012 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175000866577 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164154429703 0.0609392437508 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 69.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 62.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.