Some people believe that parents should be teaching their children to use recycled things and avoid wastage. Other argue the school the school is the best place to teach it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Methods to reduce waste and recycling should be taught to pupils at school level, as believed by few masses, whereas others opine that these procedures should be taught by the parents at home. I believe that schools ought to make students learn certain skills like waste management and recycling it, home atmosphere is the best arena to inculcate these skills into children.
Managing the waste and re-treating it in safe and effective manner can be learnt from school along with other academic studies. Teacher could allocate some time slots in time-table for activities pertaining this technique. For instance, an examination could be held for such activities and marks should be given, thereafter. Children would grasp and apply this learning methodology so that they could score good marks with flying colors.
On the contrary, as much time a child spends with parents, every material he uses can be recycled such as paper napkins, plastic straws and could be taught how. The tissue paper, as an exemplification, he uses for wiping hands and thrown in dust-bin afterwards, can be re-processed and turned back into a new tissue paper and kids could be made to learn the process at home. Moreover, plastic waste from broken toys could be re-melted and can be transformed into ball or cubes for playing purpose.
In conclusion, it can be advocated that though schools are the learning hubs for kids those can teach them to manage their household waste and recycle it properly, that too by fun learning as games, yet homes and parents could teach these aspects in a better manner in daily life.
- Some people think that having a high number of young people graduating from universities is beneficial for a country. Others, however, believe sending a high number of young people to university leads to high levels of graduate unemployment.Discuss both s 39
- Most people agree that money cannot be happiness. Why is happiness difficult to define? How can people achieve happiness? 78
- Some people believe that parents should be teaching their children to use recycled things and avoid wastage. Other argue the school the school is the best place to teach it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Due to the use of computers and mobile phones letters writing ability is disappearing To what extent do you agree 84
- Some people believe that parents should be teaching their children to use recycled things and avoid wastage Other argue the school the school is the best place to teach it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al he uses can be recycled such as paper napkins, plastic straws and could be tau...
^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
... schools are the learning hubs for kids those can teach them to manage their household wa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01498127341 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54666225574 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9643636612 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.9 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207979300486 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858483859751 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558531520056 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137973589995 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579319383887 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.