some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? discuss your views.
Recently, the phenomenon of being repetitive routine and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that eating the same food is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effective people can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the routine lifestyle standpoint, the sedentary lifestyle can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that sustainable lifestyle, as well as the broadening lifestyle, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80 percent hazardous lifestyle. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both without exciting and consistent lifestyle can be seen.
Within the realm of fear of changing, fear of risky life might increase the consequences of boring lifestyle. Moreover, fundamental aspects of continuous lifestyle relate to this reality that the demerits of excel yourself pertain to behavior in the same way. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of daily lifestyle is correlated negatively with a solid daily routine. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of not productivity.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of routine motivation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of inspiring prove the significance of productivity, but also pinpoints of shaking the routine implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-07 | pbdarab | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-30 | Pavan Konapuli | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-20 | ajayvermaETP | 85 | view |
| 2018-05-04 | masi1397 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-18 | amirnaji24 | 88 | view |
- the environmental we live in is in danger.what are the underlying causes?who is responsible to combat this? 11
- successful spors stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters.do you support it or not? 85
- some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? discuss your views. 88
- some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what are the reasons for that ? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64341085271 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26269114941 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2124257641 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145628983081 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044684664404 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441699556845 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812607841965 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605464553102 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.