Some people think that government should spend money in art and culture events while, other believe that government should invest money into other important things. Discuss both side and give your opinion
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted to the jungles to take first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irreuocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that should the governance put money into art and cultural events or into some other activities? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with examples as well as illustration and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of individual who reckon that it is essential to spend money for art and craft and cultural programs. They strengthen their view point by claiming that by organising such kind of activities we are able to preserve the culture of the society. As a result, youth (young generation) able to adopt the tradition or customer of particular society. A good illustration of this is a war museum, model of village, sceneries represent war in Sikh history for instance, were situated in the most traditional city 'Amritsar.' Tourist or students visit there get permanent knowledge and first-hand experience regarding culture through activities and sketches displayed on the walls of museum named jung-a-azadi.
Contrary to this, there is an opposing group of people who believe that government should spend money on other essential programs. To make their view point convincing they claim that it is needed by the government to provide financial assistance in the field of education. Well equipped labs, modern classrooms, big infrastructure all these facilities will be provided by the government to improve the quality of education. Moreover, government should utilize money in the field of research. Discovery of antibiotics for instance, penicillin, streptomycin to overcome the problems related to the serious ailments are only possible if governance should provide financial help to research authorities.
To crown it all, weighing both sides, I realize that there is no single conclusion still, I make this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands. Nodoubt, it is necessary to put money by the governance to organize cultural and art activities but, on other side, development of other aspects like construction of modest infrastructure of educational institutions and research in the field of medical sciences is also equally important.
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good. While other believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The three pie charts show below the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981 1991 and2001 87
- Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Human beings do not need to eat meal in order to maintain good health because they can get all their food needs from meatless products and substitute vegetarian diet is as healthy as diet containing meat argue for or against the opinion above 36
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...village, sceneries represent war in Sikh history for instance, were situated in t...
^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l and art activities but, on other side, development of other aspects like constr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, well, for instance, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28385416667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03731026321 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559895833333 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6508378532 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.352941176 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327833813339 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962097717537 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120198213924 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18238676285 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667252207418 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.