Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the music subject is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that musical instruments can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, musical learning activities can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of musical abilities, as well as music celebrities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered contemporary music. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cognitive skills and artistic viewpoint apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning musical techniques for personal life might increase the consequences of a work-life balance. Moreover, fundamental aspects of encouraging children to perform could relate to this reality that the demerits of classical music pertain to the learning disorder. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of music downloading is correlated negatively with the learning process. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of children tendencies.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of empowering music as an important subject in schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the school curriculum prove the significance of listening to favourite music, but also pinpoint music industry implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
- sports, playing in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 85
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and many are endangered. What are the causes of it and what measures can be taken to solve it? 55
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give 85
- Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68683274021 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23183403137 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626334519573 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.080197903 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.166666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302031731368 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101859208329 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859791325617 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17471614143 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522497060144 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.