Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? your opinion?
Creativity is inborn skill or it can be developed through learning has always been a debatable topic. Some people believe that it's an inborn quality and while others believe that it comes with training. I strongly believe that creativity is not inborn and this essay will talk about the reasons why it is not inborn.
To begin with, people can acquire any talent by taking lots of grooming and practicing certain things for a long duration makes them perfect in that concerted activity. Even though some things can be learned by severe training or practice, it will not make a person perfect in it if the person does not have an inborn taste in it. For example, some sportspersons become a legend in their respective events only because of their hard work and commitment to the desired goal. This example exemplifies us that hard work plays an important role than inborn skills.
Moreover, we can't say creativity is inborn talent only but it can be gained and developed in the early years by a certain education guidance and programs provided by schools and parents. Some have the ability to gain it at each stage of their life from personal experiences and lessons taught by teachers. According to Tina See, the executive director of the Stanford Technology Ventures Program, says that's a myth and she believes creativity is a renewable source of energy that we can tap into at any time and it's a process that can be learned and taught. Finally, it is the responsibility to find out the hidden talents of their child and encourage them to choose a career in which they were more creative.
According to the points discussed, one can reach out to point that even though if we get creativity as inborn that can be groomed only through practice and hard work. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that creativity is not an inborn talent and that can be achieved through dedication and encouragement from parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-02 | Onepunchman | 77 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree 85
- Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take? 85
- International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad minded what are causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 90
- PersonalDevelopment is the base for professionaldevelopment and advancing in one's career. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 70
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples life and work 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ole than inborn skills. Moreover, we cant say creativity is inborn talent only bu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nford Technology Ventures Program, says thats a myth and she believes creativity is a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...gy that we can tap into at any time and its a process that can be learned and taugh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, moreover, so, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 332.0 242.827586207 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78915662651 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58804183057 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536144578313 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4291961554 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382660484193 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151051795269 0.0925447433944 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16051375073 0.071462118173 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25733775079 0.151781067708 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109532162262 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.