Internet access should be chargeable or should it be free in this modern society? discuss
Providing internet access to the people in the present society should be paid or free has always been a debatable topic. Even though, many people claim that in today's connected world internet access is a basic need that should be provided free. Others reject this notion and argue that everyone does not deserve internet access. In my opinion, former proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both sides of the statement with clear examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, in fast-growing world internet access should be available to everyone in some form or another. Access to the internet is not only an essential utility for most but also, more importantly, one of the few media which an individual or group can reach out to the world and have their opinions voiced as equal to larger corporations. Moreover, internet acts as a medium for people to act, to discuss, to communicate and to assemble without restriction. For example, the internet is widely used in elementary schools and schools are asking students to have access to the internet at home. Recently, in Japan, the Municipal wireless network which is called Muni WI-FI has been introduced where both public and private sectors are involved to develop a network connection to provide free internet access to everyone.
On the other hand, people believe that everyone does not deserve to access the internet. For example, prisoners should not have access, nor should children who are being punished for bad behavior. It is the responsibility of the person paying for the internet to determine who is accessing the internet.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that access to the internet should be provided free to everyone. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that internet inspires merit, globalization, and sparks new outlooks in individuals
- Should government build more road to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 11
- ageing people good/bad? 70
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education is to make people ready for employment To what extent do you agree or disagree Discuss 89
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards what are advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon 64
- Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? your opinion? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, moreover, so, thus, for example, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14649681529 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78001217377 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541401273885 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9020662727 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432522358633 0.242375264174 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15947302085 0.0925447433944 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109232968046 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296375402123 0.151781067708 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597326619153 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.