The reading and the lecture are both about working day of employee, which is the day of workers want to work four-day a week from five-day a week work. The author of the reading believes that the four-day week have benefit for company and employee. The lecture casts doubt on the claims, made in the article, he thinks that the four-day week is disadvantage for organize and full-timer.
First of all, the author points out that the four-day employees are take profit for company more than the five-day employees. It is mentioned that the four-day employees can effectively work done on same project as the five-day employees and they can reduce operation cost, which is they are paid only eighty percent of the normal rate. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says the company has less earning for the four-day employees. Furthermore, he argues less workweek employees are more addional cost such as training, medical benefits and computer equipment, so the company do not get benefit from them.
Secondly, the author contends that the unemployment rate is decreased. The article notes the four-day employees have to hire more employee to keep the performance of company, which is the company recruit new employee and subcontract. She suggests the company have not more job available. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the company do not want to recruit more employee, which is they want the four-day employees work as the five-day employees.
Finally, the author states that the four-day employees have time to improve their quality life. The article established that the four-day employees have more time to stay with family and rest with them, so they can work productive more. The lecture on the other hand, posits that the four-day employees do less productive work. She puts forth the idea that a four-day workweek decrease performance of working and losing job’s stability.
In conclusions, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all of the claims and theories presented in the reading.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 66
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 73
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... have benefit for company and employee. The lecture casts doubt on the claims, made...
^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ployees work as the five-day employees. Finally, the author states that the four...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 57, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all of the claims and theories presented in the re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12048192771 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64150272622 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448795180723 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2731807989 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451084713902 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173763640674 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983665903301 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258995731441 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134881162627 0.0443174109184 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.