Nowday's the way people intract with each other has changed because of technology . In what ways has tecnology affects its types of relationship that people.

Essay topics:

Nowday's the way people intract with each other has changed because of technology . In what ways has tecnology affects its types of relationship that people.

In tech-savvy era, living standard and way of interaction of people are affected up to great extent which makes alteration in their relationship. Such type of changes can be seen all over the world. I will discuss about the ways and how relationships are affected due technology in upcoming paragraphs.
To embark with, I believed that due to advancement in technology masses forget about social relationship, which were consider most imperative in past time. For instance, now letter and personal attraction are totally replaced by internet with the help of mobile phone. People prefer to communicate through video conferencing. Meanwhile, this thing affects the life style of person up to greater extent. Furthermore, when folk interact with each other through internet sometime there is problem in communicating means receiving and sending of massage.
Another conducive idea in my mind is that usage of new advancements of technology in great extent affect the new generation. Namely, they do not know about their relatives until they cannot meet with them. Finally, creation of misunderstanding is common issue of using internet as key element of communication because it eliminates face to face interaction. People take relations as a burden and avoid as such interaction as it is possible with help of mobile phone and with other gadgets.
To conclude, I think that there is need limit the usage of internet because excess of everything is bad and relations are considered very brittle so there is great need to manage them in today’s time.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-05-23 manjit singh 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...t about social relationship, which were consider most imperative in past time. For insta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... which were consider most imperative in past time. For instance, now letter and personal ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 542, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...nicating means receiving and sending of massage. Another conducive idea in my mind is ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98931430265 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4900963052 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.769230769 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252535804363 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778562743498 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514889125266 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138134871811 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750846380299 0.0609392437508 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.