The speaker and the author of the reading article both debate on whether smart cars are beneficial or not. The author states that smart cars promise to make driving safer, quicker and less expensive and gives three supporting reasons for that. However, the speaker casts doubt by claiming that it is not clear that smart cars practically beneficial than conventional cars. The speaker gives three contradicting reasons for that.
First of all, the author of the reading posits that smart cars will prevent many accidents, thereby saving lives. On the other hand, the speaker challenges this point of the author. The speaker states that smart cars still get accidents. In addition, she adds that a small technical device of smart car can fail occasionally that cause more accidents. Besides, this smart cars allows many cars that packed public transportation road. It means more cars results in more accidents.
Next, the author avers that with the wide use of smart cars, traffic problems will practically disappear. The author adds that increased speed of smarts cars will be a great benefit, welcomed by the many people who communicate by car. Withal, the speaker contradicts this point of the author. The speaker mentions that the high speed of smart cars causes many people to drive smart cars. As a result, it will not allow drivers to take advantage of getting more time to communicate.
Finally, the author explains that smarts cars will bring a reduction in the cost of driving. In contrast, the speaker says that this high technology of smart car is too expensive than mechanical car. She adds that smart cars need sensor device that very expensive. Besides, the cost of repairing of smart cars are more than mechanical cars. This new smart cars are off from a reduction of costs of driving because it require more cost for repair and maintenances than cost of it's saving. These are the contradicting points that made by the speaker.
The speaker and the author of the reading article both debate on whether smart cars are beneficial or not. The author states that smart cars promise to make driving safer, quicker and less expensive and gives three supporting reasons for that. However, the speaker casts doubt by claiming that it is not clear that smart cars practically beneficial than conventional cars. The speaker gives three contradicting reasons for that.
First of all, the author of the reading posits that smart cars will prevent many accidents, thereby saving lives. On the other hand, the speaker challenges this point of the author. The speaker states that smart cars still get accidents. In addition, she adds that a small technical device of smart car can fail occasionally that cause more accidents. Besides, this smart cars allows many cars that packed public transportation road. It means more cars results in more accidents.
Next, the author avers that with the wide use of smart cars, traffic problems will practically disappear. The author adds that increased speed of smarts cars will be a great benefit, welcomed by the many people who communicate by car. Withal, the speaker contradicts this point of the author. The speaker mentions that the high speed of smart cars causes many people to drive smart cars. As a result, it will not allow drivers to take advantage of getting more time to communicate.
Finally, the author explains that smarts cars will bring a reduction in the cost of driving. In contrast, the speaker says that this high technology of smart car is too expensive than mechanical car. She adds that smart cars need sensor device that very expensive. Besides, the cost of repairing of smart cars are more than mechanical cars. This new smart cars are off from a reduction of costs of driving because it require more cost for repair and maintenances than cost of it's saving. These are the contradicting points that made by the speaker.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-24 | Nikitapatel351 | 60 | view |
- The speaker and the author of the reading article both debate on whether smart cars are beneficial or not. The author states that smart cars promise to make driving safer, quicker and less expensive and gives three supporting reasons for that. However, th 60
- tpo 3
- writing 1 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 68
- Some people believe that students should be given one long vacation each year. Others believe that students should have several short vacations throughout the year. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ch 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 418, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
...eduction of costs of driving because it require more cost for repair and maintenances t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, so, still, in addition, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4862904612 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469325153374 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1947095509 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.619047619 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5238095238 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.550981201209 0.272083759551 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193962467137 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163748112872 0.0662205650399 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.397020914528 0.162205337803 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.244566997471 0.0443174109184 552% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.