Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning a foreign language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of its importance at the early age is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning a foreign language at primary school is easier due to good grasping power and in all aspects can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
For a social standpoint, learning multiple languages can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of knowing multiple languages can be an achievement to one's career and its importance in today's world are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiment, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered learning in early age can be very easy and make ready to face the future endeavors. Thus, beneficial ramifications of learning something in primary school rather than secondary school apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning a foreign language at initial age might increase consequences of pressure on kids. Moreover, fundamental aspects of learning anything in primary school would relate to this reality that the demerits of showing less interest in other compulsory subjects. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning an additional language is correlated negatively with showing interest in native language. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of disconnection among the people who don't understand that language.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of learning a foreign language at primary school outweigh its demerits. Thus, the positive impact of this on children's future can be seen.
- It is as important for school children to study music, art, and sport as it is for them to become literate and numerate.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 80
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- It is as important for school children to study music, art, and sport as it is for them to become literate and numerate.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...iple languages can be an achievement to ones career and its importance in todays wor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n of disconnection among the people who dont understand that language. To conclude,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4064516129 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02545565062 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2645154386 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331902380819 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121486939801 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950504755115 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209315104042 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441984867148 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.