More and more media attention is being paid to famous people who are successful in sports and movies. Why do you think this is happening? Is this a good thing?
Media plays an important role to make public aware of the things happened around them. But, media is paying attention towards the life of well-known individuals for example, sports players, actors and actresses instead of showing any other news. There are several reasons behind this trend. In my opinion, this has a bad impact on the society.
Nowadays, radio, television, newspaper, instances of media are full of news related to famous people. The predominant cause of this happening is that community has adopted film-stars and sportsmen as their role model and want to know about their lifestyle. Hence, media broadcasts what people want to see, in order to improve its Television Rating Point.
Another, reason is that media do not have any other news to present to the society. However, to run their business, they present the personal life of the stars such as where they had their dinner, when they arrived to airport from their trip and even about their children as well as family matters.
But, this is bad practice as it is illegal to expose someone's personal life in front of others. It may arouse various issues which lead to dreadful conditions in the country, for instance, strikes. Moreover, mind of the youngsters is similar to sponge and absorbs whatever they see or hear. They try to copy the lifestyles of their favourites and start drinking, smoking, gambling which give rise to social evils in the society for example, indulge into fights with other fellows without any reason, after drinking they are not in their senses and driving while drinking causes accidents, when they do not get money to smoke or drink then they steal money and other expensive things, rape cases and list goes on.
To conclude, I would like to say that displaying anyone's personal life on media is illegal practice and lead to various problems. So, government should ban such activities. Instead, productive programs related to education, traditions of other culture, talks with specialists, etctera should be aired for the welfare of the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | khushbu1994 | 55 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | shaan9888 | 83 | view |
- You have recently moved to a new flat Unfortunately you lost some money the other day and can not afford to pay next month s rent which is due Write a letter to the landlord explaining the situation and that you will pay as soon as your parents send the m 81
- Some people say material possessions are very useful in bringing us happiness but other argue that they are useless in terms of providing happiness.Discuss both the views and your opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from you 73
- Many people want to have a successful career and a happy family life both. What problems are involved in combining a career and family life? How to overcome such problems? 78
- Your friend wants to come to your city and stay with you for one week for a holiday. However, it is impossible for you to accompany him. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter, you should;• apologise to your friend• explain why you cannot stay 73
- In some countries it is common for women to participate in the workforce when their children are young What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05588235294 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47039740159 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608823529412 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.2168625817 49.4020404114 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126379427631 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472882964939 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360430332608 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761757770931 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597537991091 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.