TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task
Text and the lecture both are discussing about the cause and solution of descreasing the population of frogs. Two have opposed viewpoint as follow.
First, based on the reading, by removing pestoside around the frog lands it would be beneficial for cobtroling the population inclinement. Professor has a diffrent opinion and states that is not a practical idea; since does not economical and fair.
Second, Unlike the text, lecturer points it out that killing fungus growing around demands to act in groups of them not individuals; which is incredibaly expensive. What's more, regarding global warming, the idea of killing by heat does not seem to be reasonable.
Finally, as lecturer mentions, protecting lakes and marshes from human over-use could not come into practice due to some problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Hem | 3 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | fatimamsy | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | mahi22 | 81 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | tabatabaei777 | 83 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | chensixian | 76 | view |
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 60
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 76
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity. in 2010(Cambridge Academic 12). 84
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...on of frogs. Two have opposed viewpoint as follow. First, based on the reading, by remov...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke the text, lecturer points it out that killing fungus growing around demands to...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...iduals; which is incredibaly expensive. Whats more, regarding global warming, the ide...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, regarding, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 22.412803532 22% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 670.0 1373.03311258 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 127.0 270.72406181 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27559055118 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.35699682299 4.04702891845 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76419450863 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 145.348785872 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.748031496063 0.540411800872 138% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 419.366225166 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1807499019 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7142857143 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179496803601 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658758142067 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569988971755 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919124484931 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393307891997 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.