Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is sometimes thought that new technological innovation is widening the existing social distance between the affluent and underprivileged people while others hold the opposite view. In my opinion, I think that the latter philosophy has many logical aspects to embrace.
Admittedly, some argue that the social status is being increased among the poor and rich by the influence of technological advancement. To illustrate, most of the technological equipment and gadgets are so attractive and cozy that everyone wants to have them irrespective of their financial background; but mostly the rich get the privileges to buy those things. For instance, a university student from a wealthy family can easily fulfill his desire to own a car or a smartphone, whereas the one who earned himself to pay his academic fees would never imagine having those luxuries. Consequently, jealous mentality might be the ultimate outcome.
On the other hand, according to others, people from different categories, now enjoy the same advantages due to the blessing of the state-of-the-art technology. In other words, hi-tech in education, today helps both the rich and poor students to educate further that certainly a positive impact for any culture. As a result, a mixture of the workforce who comes from both rich and poor families can be observed in any workplace. Furthermore, advanced technology appears to offer an equal service to every person without considering their social standards. To withdraw money from a teller machine, for example, everybody should maintain their turns but in the past, the rich seemed to be pampered mare than the poor, for the same.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinion, I believe that the modern technology is not widening rather shrinking the gap between the rich and poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-15 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | sharmaisha | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both the sides and give your own opinion. 89
- Social media has replaced the traditional methods of communication and people use more and more social media to communicate and to follow news and events Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 92
- Due to the use of computers and mobiles phones letter writing ability is disappearing To what extent do you agree 82
- Due to the use of computers and mobiles phones, letter-writing ability is disappearing. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The trend of increased consumer goods production is damaging the natural environment Why is it still happening What are the solutions for this situation 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28620689655 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95983617826 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7049694001 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4166666667 7.06120827912 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266421224982 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870772878587 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797820077473 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166332050042 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671389644323 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.