Eventually electric cars will solve all of our transport and environmental issues Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of electric cars with regards to this statement Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from your own experience o

Technology has become so advanced these days with new inventions to ease human life. Electric cars will eventually solve the various environments as well as transport issues that currently we are facing due to motor vehicle using engines. In my opinion, electric cars have a more positive impact than negatives on human life. This essay will discuss both merits and demerits of electric cars on environments and human life.

One of the most important advantages of electric cars is that they are an environment-friendly as they run by electric charge rather than fuel or gas. Electric motors do not emit any CO2 or other gases that cause air pollution. Moreover, this will decrease sound pollution as these cars do not make any sound. According to " Times Magazine December 2017 edition", the proportion of environment pollution as dropped from 30% to 10% after the usage of electric vehicles. Additionally, this will decrease greenhouse effect and reduce global warming as well.

Like everything come on both positive as well as negative consequences, so does electric motors. One of the demerits of electric motors is that they run by electric charges which mean electric supply will be directly affected as that care might consume too much electricity. Besides, these vehicles cannot travel more 50-100 km as they might need to be charged again which is not possible everywhere. Furthermore, these sort of transports is only available with 2 seats which means it is not productive for the entire family to travel together.

Given arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some disadvantages, the advantages of electric cars have more positive impacts on the ecosystem which will directly affect human life.

Votes
Average: 4 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... Like everything come on both positive as well as negative consequences, so does electric...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...s not possible everywhere. Furthermore, these sort of transports is only available with 2 ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, sort of, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86230783153 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6076297244 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248029722087 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899434551188 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512255430277 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152877212177 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485638709766 0.0609392437508 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.