The two maps show the road that links the hospital with the city road changed from 2007 to 2010. Overall, the improvement of road was related to the road system and transport facilities.
Before, the city hospital was connected with the city road by the hospital road and the surrounding road, called ring road. However, in 2010, the two crosses between hospital road and the other two roads were upgraded to the two roundabouts to support the move of buses and cars to enter the hospital.
As for the facilities, visitors can enter this hospital via six bus stops alongside the hospital road in 2007, but in 2010 these stops were removed for the use of bus station which was connected with both roundabouts. Previously, cars could be parked at the car park in front of the hospital but later this car park was staff0-only while visitors can drive their cars through the ring road and enter the public car park at the east of hospital.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad and the other two roads were upgraded to the two roundabouts to support the mo...
^^
Line 6, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the hospital but later this car park was staff0-only while visitors can drive...
^^
Line 6, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ring road and enter the public car park at the east of hospital.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68674698795 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36546866582 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6219880583 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242805863496 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162162444755 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11135618964 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209081469694 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093581407939 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.