The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.
The presented circular layout depicts the information about the land degradation by four primary genesis in the world whereas the tabular representation showcases the total proportion of land degraded in the three nations during the time period of 1990. Collaboration of data was done in per centum.
Overall, it is evident that amongst the four causes , overgrazing was the highest significant part while the least contribution by overcultivation. However, Europe was the most adversely affected area.
At first glance it is clear that, overgrazing is the major culprit with 35%share in land degradation. The following deforestation which claimed at 30% , and overcultivation had least share comprises of 28%.
It can be dogged that, the most affected nation was Eroupe which accounted for 23% whereas the 5% of total land degraded had shown by the North America.Deforestation had been the main reason which destoyed 9.8% land.Oceania was the significant affected area with 11.3% by overgrazing.
- The chart below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2002 96
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 61
- The following graph and pie chart shows the sales of a company in the first and the second quarter of the year. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the during the 1990. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'genesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'geneses'.
Suggestion: geneses
...ut the land degradation by four primary genesis in the world whereas the tabular repres...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... is evident that amongst the four causes , overgrazing was the highest significant...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...owing deforestation which claimed at 30% , and overcultivation had least share com...
^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the least'.
Suggestion: had the least
...ch claimed at 30% , and overcultivation had least share comprises of 28%. It can be do...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...% , and overcultivation had least share comprises of 28%. It can be dogged that, the most...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Deforestation
...degraded had shown by the North America.Deforestation had been the main reason which destoyed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Oceania
...he main reason which destoyed 9.8% land.Oceania was the significant affected area with...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed 9.8% land.Oceania was the significant affected area with 11.3% by overgrazing....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34015574011 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.2147244636 43.030603864 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122558225785 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456878454618 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444840486051 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.06845719452 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038287016489 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.