Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is incontrovertibly axiomatic that education plays a momentous role in the people's attitude and life. Bearing this fact in mind, a heated controversy exists as to whether all university students should be obliged to take history courses or not. Although it is hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to great extent, on the belief that taking history courses should not be mandatory for all students for quite a few reasons, among which the most conspicuous ones are substantiated hereunder.
To commence, the first exquisite reason which advocates my viewpoint is the importance of scientific courses for university student. It is crystal clear that in today's competitive world, technologies have monumental effects on the lives of people as well as development of a country, and university students as an important pillars of any communities should be more involved in innovative researches rather than ancient history courses. Furthermore, students by acquainting with cutting-edge technologies, not only would make a tremendous influences on progression of technologies, but also would make enormous contribution in development of a country, which would pave the way for people to have triumph in different aspects of their lives. However, if universities compel students to take history courses, they would not have enough time to getting to grips with modern science, and their time would be wasted significantly. Therefore, the more students be involved in modern science and make progress in technology, the more prosperous the society would be.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, the fact that different kinds of information such as history are available on the internet is another point which requires meticulous attention. The conventional wisdom is that by using internet, all students may have a great opportunity to get informed about different desired subjects like history in their free time, so there is no need to require them to take history courses in the university. Moreover, from the psychological perspective, the more students be obliged to take imperative courses, the less they pay heed to that courses; accordingly, it is not far-fetched to presume that students would not learn anything in the obligatory courses. Hence, being interested in specific courses and the process of learning are inextricably intertwined, as a consequence, students should not take courses imperatively because it would be entirely worthless
Drawing upon the reasons, although there are some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, I do agree that taking history course should not be necessary for university students. To recapitulate the reasons, not only should students take more courses about science and technology, but also students have opportunity to get acquainted with history on the internet if they want. Consequently, I recommend that policy-maker pay more attention to these facts.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 73
- Which one is the most important factor to help you work productively Having an environment which is free of noise and distractions Knowing that you will receive a reward Doing something you are interested in 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...education plays a momentous role in the peoples attitude and life. Bearing this fact in...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ct in mind, a heated controversy exists as to whether all university students should be oblig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'pillar'?
Suggestion: pillar
...and university students as an important pillars of any communities should be more invol...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'influence'?
Suggestion: influence
...ogies, not only would make a tremendous influences on progression of technologies, but als...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46170678337 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09587103251 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498905908096 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.386058021 48.9658058833 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.285714286 100.406767564 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6428571429 20.6045352989 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299288600435 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11087158672 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072302322905 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200741594092 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331932009096 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 11.7677419355 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.