The reading and the lecture are both about the Edmontosaurs. The author of the reading states that Edmontosaurs animals survived in the winter by migrating to hospitable or warmer regions and provides three reasons for support. However, the lecturer explains that Edmontosaurs did not migrate to other regions during the winter and refutes each of the author's points.
First, the article conveys that due to insufficient food in the winter and dark north winter Edmontosaurus has migrated to other regions. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that in Alaska's North slope sun shines 24 hours. Hence, there is a chance for growing a large number of plants with highly nutritious food.
Second, the text explains that Edmontosaurus have migrated in herbs. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this point by explaining that if they migrate in herbs predators can easily attack them. He also provided an example of U.S animal which moved in herbs was affected by predators.
Third, the article posits that Edmontosaurs can move long distances easily by using its locomotive energy at the speed of 45 kilometers per hour. However, the professor says that they were not physically capable of moving to long distances and adults also cannot move. They were slow and can't reach destinations with less time.
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 83
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 80
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 60
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd refutes each of the authors points. First, the article conveys that due to i...
^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s. Hence, there is a chance for growing a large number of plants with highly nutritious food. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... them. He also provided an example of U.S animal which moved in herbs was affecte...
^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ts also cannot move. They were slow and cant reach destinations with less time.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19069767442 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64934250035 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623255813953 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2380352175 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331728920529 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108979223222 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693907345471 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176234442082 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361427798271 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.