In the preceding arguments, the author presented two distinct conclusions on the research about child-rearing practice on the island of Tertia. Dr. Karp stated that the results got by observations from Dr. Field twenty years ago were invalid, thus suggested interview-centered method should be used. Although the argument may seem tenable at first glance, upon careful scrutiny, it is full of assumptions or premises.
To begin with, Dr. Karp believed that the conclusion that children in Tertia were reared by the whole village is inaccurate because children talked more about their biological parents during interviews. This fact may hint at a closer relationship between children and biological parents than to other adults, but it's not enough to infer the rear practice in the community. It's quite likely that group rearing does exist, but somehow the children still make connections with their biological parents. Obviously, a more thorough study is needed.
Additionally, Dr. Karp and his supportives failed to take cultural changes on Tertia island into consideration. Dr. Field's investigation was carried out some twenty years ago. Although the island of Tertia is a relatively separate community with its own cultures, it's possible that some of their traditions and ways of living have changed in the past two decades. There's no description on how child-rearing practices evolved in the past twenty years. Thus, it's unreasonable to compare results from Dr. Karp with those from Dr. Field.
Last but not least, building upon the implication that Dr. Field's conclusions are wrong, many researchers proposed that interview-centered methods should be used in child-rearing research. It's definitely too early to reach this conclusion before the conflicts in this study are solved. What's more, even if Dr. Karp was right, it's still not wise to exclude other research methods. Different ways of investigation focus on different aspects of a issue. Only by using a combination of various methods can we get a thorough understanding of the issue.
Due to aforementioned evidences, although the author mentioned some factors that support Dr. Karp's opinions, the reasons are not deeply investigated and are full of assumptions. As a result, only with more vigorous and thorough analysis can we know the truth about child-rearing traditions on the island of Tertia and the best way to investigate this topic.
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 75
- TPO44-Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 73
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 76
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 76
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores.“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are f 83
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- not exactly
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
here goes a sample:
https://www.testbig.com/story/gre-argument-essay-topic-21-outline
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 379 350
No. of Characters: 1997 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.412 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.269 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.98 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.947 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.409 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.474 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.303 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.531 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.056 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...g have changed in the past two decades. Theres no description on how child-rearing pra...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ould be used in child-rearing research. Its definitely too early to reach this conc...
^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...the conflicts in this study are solved. Whats more, even if Dr. Karp was right, its s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...stigation focus on different aspects of a issue. Only by using a combination of v...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, thus, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 2260.96107784 90% => OK
No of words: 379.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37994722955 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04875529277 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55672823219 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2666743505 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.315789474 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24325319916 0.218282227539 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732047482179 0.0743258471296 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600252056647 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137026660803 0.128457276422 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581676596352 0.0628817314937 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.