Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets; however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The expenditure on space programs to search for life on other planets should be increased, according to some people, while others consider it is wastage of money as there are other serious issues to be addressed on earth. In my opinion, although priority should be given to immediate problems, a portion of budget should be invested in future safety i.e. space exploration.
To begin with, searching life on other space bodies could be a contingent plan in the worst case because of increasing risk to life on earth. The necessary resources for life, such as air and water, are completely exploited that puts us on the risk of extinction if proper actions are not taken on time. Moreover, it is crystal clear by now that planet is not livable for the same amount of time what we have already enjoyed on the earth. Thus, all the effort to make human as multi-planetary species by government as well as by private sector, such as Tesla organization, is justifiable.
However, there are other serious issues on earth which needs immediate attention than future problems. Take for an example of global warming, if it is not controlled, the planet will be uninhabitable sooner than we expected. Besides, when common man struggling for proper meal and potable water, it is not advisable to spend millions of taxpayers money, which can utilized effectively to solve basic need scarcity, to chase a mirage. For instance, poor country, such as Spain, is spending half of their total GDP on space agency overlooking the needs of their people. Thus, budget for space exploration should be prioritized after carefully examining the economic status of the nation.
In Conclusion, life exploration on other planes will be beneficial if nation can afford it but immediate problem should be given more priority. Thus, it is reasonable for developed countries compared to underdeveloped nations.
- Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing a doctor. Why this is so? Is it a positive or negative development according to you? 84
- Writing a letter to building manager regarding a problem parking your bicycle.When you started to use bicycle to go to workWhat the problem isSuggesting the solution of the problem. 73
- Your company had a meeting at hotel and you are disappointing over facilities.Write a letter to manager about the event and advise. 89
- You have a pen-friend living in another country and he/she is curious to learn about the major news items in your country.Write a letter to your pen-friend. In your letter:•Greet your friend and say why you are writing.•Briefly describe a news story. 78
- You went to a theater yesterday with a friend Your friend had an accident and a staff member helped Write to manager How it happened How staff member helped What should be done in future 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the economic status of the nation. In Conclusion, life exploration on other...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07717041801 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82027481306 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581993569132 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6677066376 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.461538462 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264234418973 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865677403535 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673063735645 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165447510587 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457366968265 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.