First of all, the author of the reading points out that the spores are the main sources that P.ramorun develops from it and it is carried out by human shoes and on bicycle tires. Hence, the reading suggests that hikers that need to get rid off these spores by washing them thoroughly. The lecturer is challenged by this point. She suggests that the spores are not the main cause of spreading the fungus and she mentions that rainfall is the cause. The rainfall that washes spores and it carried into streams. This way it affects the oak trees mainly.
Secondly, the contends that chemicals that causes natural defense to these oak trees could be used to safeguard these treets. The lecturer bebuts on this arguments. She suggests that these chemicals lasts only for few months and it has be repeated to protect the trees. Moreover, the lecturer ssays that it is impractical and expensiveto use chemicals in order to protect oak trees.
Finally, the article states that the clear- cutting could be done to protect oak trees that gets affected from P.ramorum. The article notes that that some of the trees surrounding affected oak trees could also possible get cut in these process which will be an effective measure to pause spreading infections to all trees. The lecturer, on the other hand posits that will be not healthy to cut trees that are in good shape in these clearcut process. As a result, many healthy trees will be get cut which will result in ecological damage.
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 70
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 51
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people say that artists should be financially supported by the governments of their countries. However others believe that there are other choices that can be made. Do you agree or disagree? 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain sources that P.ramorun develops from it and it is carried out by human shoes ...
^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rd these treets. The lecturer bebuts on this arguments. She suggests that these chem...
^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ls lasts only for few months and it has be repeated to protect the trees. Moreover...
^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...ected from P.ramorum. The article notes that that some of the trees surrounding affected ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... P.ramorum. The article notes that that some of the trees surrounding affected oak trees co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, moreover, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8046875 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32345378693 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49609375 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9759491221 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8571428571 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.