Science and religion are not like the two faces of the same coin to be dependent, they are unrelated. Science aims to improve the life. It brings advancements in the society. Religion on the other hand is more about the different almighties people believe, different traditions and customs they follow. Both the streams though, have their roots back to many centuries.To strengthen this argument we can consider few cases.
Firstly, the greatest achievement of science is the Big Bang theory by the great scientist, Mr.Stephen Hawking. It din't need him the support of any religion to prove his theory. Not only Big Bang theory, many inventions like the Electric Bulb by Einstein, Newtons laws, Telephone. All these inventors never stated that they were supported by a certain religion, or their beliefs.
Secondly, the existence of god, the detection of godly particles in the universe by NASA. This proves that Science is solving the debate on the existence of god. Even in this process it is neither supporting any religion nor is been supported by any religion. It is in fact giving an evidence for the religious beliefs. Then how could science be meaningless without religion.
Thirdly, there is no separate science for each religion. Science is a common field for all the religions across the world. The scientists and inventors may be from different religions but they all believe in unique science. Science is a young man never needs the support of any other person or stick to support itself. It can stand on itself.
Collecting all the pieces together, we can clearly oppose the argument that science is meaningless without religion. It only needs the support of hope for advancing forward. It brings out the facts of life, which at times may oppose or support a religion. But the fact to be believed is science is independent. In fact, many other fields depend on it.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 54
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 82
- The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, including tel 29
- Science is meaningless without religion. 50
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...have their roots back to many centuries.To strengthen this argument we can conside...
^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Stephen
... Bang theory by the great scientist, Mr.Stephen Hawking. It dint need him the support o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99367088608 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63644632467 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0443865297 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.75 118.986275619 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1666666667 23.4991977007 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398937044565 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113379187397 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138690831064 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22963187681 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803783734205 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.77 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.