University should accept equal numbers of male and female student in every subject.
Today education is more achievable than past for men and women. At beginning education was so expensive and every one couldn’t learn easy, but in continuing and with changing in social and political attitude everyone was entitled for understanding. At first condition for women learning was not so good as men but after industrial change in Europe and with women engaging in public affair, social tend was increased gradually and education behalf have been known for women. Nowadays women have equal right as men for educating. But a question have been made, the number of acceptance for women and men should be equaled?
People regard of their state have the same behalf to life and all that have changed their position, is ability and trying. So that men and women can do different works due to their potential and attempting. This day there many women who are working in hard position as a mineral, transit driver or building worker and contemporary there have been many men who have been working as a child career or cooker and etc. Therefore without any doubt just ability and effort is efficient on apply for an education position or a job vacancy.
So we can say that equal number of male and female couldn’t be an affordable factor for accepting in a job or college position. Thus descent ability parameter should be considered in approval routes firmly and sexual couldn’t definitely get for accepting a students. So I can say that I am extremely disagree with state as a parameter in education approval process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-16 | javad_70 | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | minhchau2205 | 61 | view |
- The table shows the number of foreign visitor to 7 countries.Summarize the information by selecting the reporting and make comparison where relevant. 67
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- Some expert believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...een working as a child career or cooker and etc. Therefore without any doubt just abilit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...accepting in a job or college position. Thus descent ability parameter should be con...
^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...ldn't definitely get for accepting a students. So I can say that I am extremely disag...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...dents. So I can say that I am extremely disagree with state as a parameter in education ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 6.8 338% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92692307692 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72636426953 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.940939315 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110033327572 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522903167082 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821576202835 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821112769272 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678895269493 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.