TPO 30 - Question 5

Speaking topics
Speaking recording upload
Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Speaking category

Comments

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 634.0 599.738853503 106% => OK
No of words: 173.0 158.596602972 109% => OK
Chars per words: 3.66473988439 3.77925476217 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.54123138178 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.90914276271 1.79916674678 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 95.8789808917 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.607024082132 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Syllable count: 208.8 189.005732484 110% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.19129511677 101% => OK

Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0760155198353 0.0831539838537 91% => OK

Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 2.0 4.29936305732 47% => OK
Average paragraph length: 86.5 70.8089261375 122% => OK
STD paragraph length: 57.5 23.6022091992 244% => Paragraph length changes often.
Average paragraph duration: 29.895 25.9380837976 115% => OK
STD paragraph duration: 19.305 8.54438981162 226% => The duration of acoustic paragraphs changes often.

Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 26.0 40.7070063694 64% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 6.65384615385 4.24305496596 157% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 5.05312019139 3.29867071766 153% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 2.29115384615 1.4825078846 155% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 1.41598654634 1.02222390891 139% => OK

Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 22.0 38.0 58% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 5.5 7.14643312102 77% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.25 0.189447223375 132% => Maybe the pauses are too long.
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.163707055437 0.156783300276 104% => OK

Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 50.95 46.7170700637 109% => OK
Average word duration: 0.29450867052 0.297490414073 99% => OK
STD word duration: 0.184548867802 0.186336302485 99% => OK

Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 10.0 7.29723991507 137% => It may have 'ehn' in the speaking, or it has hesitations or overlapping speeches.
Total_disfluencies_duration: 7.78 5.7916985138 134% => Somehow the hesitation is serious.
Total acoustic noise duration: 1.33 3.38276008493 39% => OK

Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 59.79 59.3491295117 101% => OK
Compare to expected duration: 0.9965 0.989152158528 101% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.367954507443 0.642608181899 57% => OK
Rate of speech: 2.89346044489 2.6701766005 108% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.60561966884 1.61481078811 99% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 1.88420019627 2.05366198651 92% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.399511098266 0.327712499341 122% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.

18 in 30

the introduction is too long. it takes around 40 seconds. More contents should be put on arguments.

Try this time pattern for Q5:

part 1. Briefly summarize the problem the speakers are discussing. //about 15 seconds.

part 2. Then state which of the two solutions from the conversation you would recommend. //about 15 seconds. Like: there are possibly two solutions: The first one is: blabla....the second one is: blabla...If I were the woman/man, I would choose the first/second solution.

part 3. Explain the reason for your recommendation. because reason 1, blabla ...reason 2, blabla(about 30 seconds)...

----------------------
follow this user for Q5 who got 27 in speaking and she followed this pattern:
http://www.testbig.com/users/patel-dolly

-----------------
here goes the sample answer:
https://www.testbig.com/comment/53908#comment-53908