We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in businesses, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their benefits?
Recently, the phenomenon of dependence on computers and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that computer is an indispensable invention and it is highly beneficial for human being, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of computer can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, usage of computer in every sphere like education, science and medical can provide people with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of saving time and cost, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment on computer which discovered the influence of computer in improving professional life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both improving the accuracy of weather forecast and helping student to learn distance education apparently can be seen.
From a realm of advance technology, too much dependence on computer might increase the consequences of unhealthy lifestyle. Moreover, fundamental aspects of computers could relate to this reality that the demerits of this invention pertain to bad eyesight and some other serious diseases. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the computers is correlated negatively with significant increase in unemployment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of computers far outweigh its drawback. However, people should be prudent enough to have fruitful outcomes of this invention.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-20 | Baljinder Kaur | 88 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in businesses, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspici 88
- Global climate change is regarded as a severe problem. Who should take responsibilities governments, large companies or individuals? Please explain 85
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion? 77
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education to make people ready for employment.Agree or disagree. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to distance'
Suggestion: to distance
...r forecast and helping student to learn distance education apparently can be seen. Fr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64642857143 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2014326353 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621428571429 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0522718852 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.75 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146340827683 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054611172336 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335580108315 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879488543592 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289688579481 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.