The table below presents information about Australian economy in the late 1980s Write a report describing the trends in profits shown in table

Essay topics:

The table below presents information about Australian economy in the late 1980s. Write a report describing the trends in profits shown in table.

The table shows Australian company profits before tax for the period 1986-90 in four sections: Manufacturing, Mining, Retail Trade and other industries.

The most important sector was manufacturing, where profits nearly doubled from 1986 to 1989 to peak as $8.6 billion, followed by Mining, where profits reached almost $5 billion in 1989-90, after fluctuating just below $4 billion for the previous three years.

Profits in Retail Trade also grew strongly during the four year period, doubling to just below $1.4 billion. In other industries there was steady growth in profits for three years from $1.2 billion to almost $1.7 billion, followed by a crash to below $0.4 billion in 1989-90.

Overall, after consistent rises from 1986-1989, profits in Retail Trade levelled off in 1989-90, while those in Manufacturing and other Industries both fell. In other Industries the fall was particularly sudden, to less than a quarter of their 1989 level. Only Mining, where profits had been steady during 1986-89, showed a significant rise in profits.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (9 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-21 Manu12 75 view
Essays by user Manu12 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by Mining, where profits reached almost billion in 1989-90, after fluctuating ju...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...y Mining, where profits reached almost billion in 1989-90, after fluctuating just belo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 1989-90, after fluctuating just below billion for the previous three years. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37423312883 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65647713886 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9201054875 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884460467271 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489746379837 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290664760731 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065958650694 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229082295562 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.