The line graph shows the percentage of people living below poverty line(According to world standards) in developing countries for the year 1900 to 2050.
The given linear graph reveals the information about the people who living below poverty line a survey conducted by world standards in four developing countries during the year 1900 to 2050. The data is calibrated in percentum which is clearly and coherently represented.
It is crystal clear from the graph, in Mexico country the highest percentage of people living below poverty line was increased year by year. However, in the Brazil nation the percentage of people had constant(30 percent) of people in countries China, India and Mexico was 10,15 and 90 percent respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that, during the year 1950 and 2000 the percentage of Brazil people had been increased. Moving further, in the year 2000 and 2050 the percentage of china people had decreased year by year. Whereas, the percentage of either Mexico or Brazil people during the year 2050 was 90 percent.
Overall, it is evident that the highest percentage of Mexico and Brazil people living below poverty line as compare to other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-22 | Manpreetgill | 73 | view |
- The daigrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the cancrete for building purposes? 78
- The three pie charts below show the chnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 73
- The daigrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the cancrete for building purposes? 78
- The table below gives information about Favorite pastime in different cauntries in percentage. (/means data not avilable) 11
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.Water use, selected countries - 2000? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07647058824 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58128076362 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6840651453 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459218784203 0.215688989381 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217367643825 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157864797085 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301492391846 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079547252299 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.