As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
In the modern world, as the technology is burgeoning at exponential pace people are fully exploiting it. Now-a-days technology is not just an aid, technologies like calculators, computers, mobile phones etc. are necessities. People working in the accounts department of any firm never give up there calculators. Similarly, employees working in call centers have their platform on telephones. However, for instance, technologies like iPods, tablets given to an immature child can be harmless for his/her natural growth which these technologies affect in many ways.
Today, for every major to minor thing people use Google. Google is a search engine which answers your all questions. You ask how much 2+2 is?, how to make butter cookies? , when India got freedom? , who is the winner of FIFA 2018? , it will answer anything. Most of the times people don’t even apply a little brain to solve calculations like 2+2, they just directly search it online or put in calculator. Study shows that if one keep challenging and doing mathematical calculation with his/her brain the capability to tackle much complicated task improves and subsequently critical and analytical thinking also improves. Other times they want to know how to become smart? , how to do this? , how to do that?, without even figuring out what is best for them and what is not. They just blindly follow the top most results of google search without any second thought. This is surely affecting their mindset toward life. Everybody have problems some find the solution online some doesn’t but what I suggest if one find there solution by themselves, it will lead to the growth of one in much better way.
However, if there are some cons then there are also some pros. People who actually doesn’t have that sharp brain, technology can aid them to become smart and subsequently grow in their career. The online platforms like Youtube, Dailymotion etc. from where people learn new things is really necessary in the modern world of competence. On an all, technology is not just deleterious to human brain it is somehow helping others too to understand and grow. The same internet which is affecting critical thinking of smart people is helping other to become smart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- “The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the la 50
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'accounts'' or 'account's'?
Suggestion: accounts'; account's
... are necessities. People working in the accounts department of any firm never give up th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ch 2+2 is?, how to make butter cookies? , when India got freedom? , who is the wi...
^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tter cookies? , when India got freedom? , who is the winner of FIFA 2018? , it wi...
^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...edom? , who is the winner of FIFA 2018? , it will answer anything. Most of the ti...
^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... they want to know how to become smart? , how to do this? , how to do that?, with...
^
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... how to become smart? , how to do this? , how to do that?, without even figuring ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, really, second, similarly, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12295081967 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72540729082 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601092896175 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5707132153 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.64 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.32 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148675431999 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343154342483 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341588879045 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101579520584 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186410766746 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.